CMF / CRF Details
CMF ID: 10301
Convert a conventional signalized intersection to a continuous flow intersection (CFI)
Description:
Prior Condition: Conventional signalized intersection
Category: Intersection geometry
Study: Development of Performance Matrices for Evaluating Innovative Intersections and Interchanges, Zlatkovic, M., 2015
Star Quality Rating: | [View score details] |
Rating Points Total: | 95 |
Crash Modification Factor (CMF) | |
---|---|
Value: | 0.877 |
Adjusted Standard Error: | |
Unadjusted Standard Error: | 0.045 |
Crash Reduction Factor (CRF) | |
---|---|
Value: | 12.3 (This value indicates a decrease in crashes) |
Adjusted Standard Error: | |
Unadjusted Standard Error: | 4.5 |
Applicability | |
---|---|
Crash Type: | All |
Crash Severity: | All |
Roadway Types: | Not specified |
Street Type: | |
Minimum Number of Lanes: | |
Maximum Number of Lanes: | |
Number of Lanes Direction: | |
Number of Lanes Comment: | |
Crash Weather: | Not specified |
Road Division Type: | |
Minimum Speed Limit: | |
Maximum Speed Limit: | |
Speed Unit: | |
Speed Limit Comment: | |
Area Type: | Not specified |
Traffic Volume: | |
Average Traffic Volume: | |
Time of Day: | All |
If countermeasure is intersection-based | |
Intersection Type: | Roadway/roadway (not interchange related) |
Intersection Geometry: | 4-leg |
Traffic Control: | Signalized |
Major Road Traffic Volume: | |
Minor Road Traffic Volume: | |
Average Major Road Volume : | |
Average Minor Road Volume : |
Development Details | |
---|---|
Date Range of Data Used: | 2008 to 2013 |
Municipality: | |
State: | UT |
Country: | |
Type of Methodology Used: | Before/after using empirical Bayes or full Bayes |
Sample Size (crashes): | 1050 crashes before, 830 crashes after |
Sample Size (sites): | 7 sites before, 7 sites after |
Sample Size (site-years): | 20 site-years before, 28 site-years after |
Other Details | |
---|---|
Included in Highway Safety Manual? | No |
Date Added to Clearinghouse: | Mar 23, 2020 |
Comments: |