CMF / CRF Details
Install Train Detection System
Countermeasure ID: 10705
Description: Train Detection System to activate railroad grade crossing warning
Prior Condition: base condition: no train detection system
Category: Railroad grade crossings
Study: Geometric effect analysis of highway-rail grade crossing safety performance, Keramati et al., 2020
Study Type: Journal Article/Book
| Star Quality Rating: |  [View score details] |
| Rating Points Total: | 60 |
| Crash Modification Factor (CMF) | |
|---|---|
| Value: | 0.23 |
| Adjusted Standard Error: | |
| Unadjusted Standard Error: | |
| Crash Reduction Factor (CRF) | |
|---|---|
| Value: | 77 (This value indicates a decrease in crashes) |
| Adjusted Standard Error: | |
| Unadjusted Standard Error: | |
| Applicability | |
|---|---|
| Crash Type: | Other |
| Crash Severity: | K (fatal) |
| Roadway Types: | Not specified |
| Street Type: | |
| Minimum Number of Lanes: | |
| Maximum Number of Lanes: | |
| Number of Lanes Direction: | |
| Number of Lanes Comment: | |
| Crash Weather: | Not specified |
| Road Division Type: | |
| Minimum Speed Limit: | |
| Maximum Speed Limit: | |
| Speed Unit: | |
| Speed Limit Comment: | |
| Area Type: | |
| Traffic Volume: | |
| Average Traffic Volume: | |
| Time of Day: | All |
| If countermeasure is intersection-based | |
| Intersection Type: | Roadway/railroad grade crossing |
| Intersection Geometry: | No values chosen. |
| Traffic Control: | Other |
| Major Road Traffic Volume: | |
| Minor Road Traffic Volume: | |
| Average Major Road Volume : | |
| Average Minor Road Volume : | |
| Development Details | |
|---|---|
| Date Range of Data Used: | 1990 to 2018 |
| Municipality: | |
| State: | ND |
| Country: | USA |
| Type of Methodology Used: | Regression cross-section |
| Sample Size (sites): | 3194 sites |
