CMF / CRF Details
CMF ID: 11181
Presence of a pedestrian crosswalk at midblock locations
Description: segments with crosswalks and pedestrian countermeasures, such as Traffic Signals (T.S.), Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFBs), Circular Rapid Flashing Beacons (CRFBs), and Pedestrian Flashing Beacons (PFBs)
Prior Condition: midblock locations without the presence of a pedestrian crosswalk
Category: Pedestrians
Study: Safety Performance of Midblock Pedestrian Crossing Treatments, , 2022
Star Quality Rating: | [View score details] |
Rating Points Total: | 120 |
Crash Modification Factor (CMF) | |
---|---|
Value: | 0.82 |
Adjusted Standard Error: | |
Unadjusted Standard Error: |
Crash Reduction Factor (CRF) | |
---|---|
Value: | 18 (This value indicates a decrease in crashes) |
Adjusted Standard Error: | |
Unadjusted Standard Error: |
Applicability | |
---|---|
Crash Type: | Vehicle/pedestrian |
Crash Severity: | All |
Roadway Types: | Not specified |
Street Type: | |
Minimum Number of Lanes: | |
Maximum Number of Lanes: | |
Number of Lanes Direction: | |
Number of Lanes Comment: | |
Crash Weather: | Not specified |
Road Division Type: | |
Minimum Speed Limit: | |
Maximum Speed Limit: | |
Speed Unit: | |
Speed Limit Comment: | |
Area Type: | Urban |
Traffic Volume: | |
Average Traffic Volume: | |
Time of Day: | Not specified |
If countermeasure is intersection-based | |
Intersection Type: | |
Intersection Geometry: | |
Traffic Control: | |
Major Road Traffic Volume: | |
Minor Road Traffic Volume: | |
Average Major Road Volume : | |
Average Minor Road Volume : |
Development Details | |
---|---|
Date Range of Data Used: | 2012 to 2016 |
Municipality: | |
State: | FL |
Country: | |
Type of Methodology Used: |
Other Details | |
---|---|
Included in Highway Safety Manual? | No |
Date Added to Clearinghouse: | Aug 25, 2022 |
Comments: |