CMF / CRF Details
CMF ID: 11752
Presence of a pedestrian crosswalk with signal at midblock locations
Description:
Prior Condition: No Prior Condition(s)
Category: Pedestrians
Study: Midblock Pedestrian Signal Safety Effectiveness, Fitzpatrick et al., 2024
| Star Quality Rating: |  [View score details] |
| Rating Points Total: | 150 |
| Crash Modification Factor (CMF) | |
|---|---|
| Value: | 0.66 |
| Adjusted Standard Error: | |
| Unadjusted Standard Error: | |
| Crash Reduction Factor (CRF) | |
|---|---|
| Value: | 34 (This value indicates a decrease in crashes) |
| Adjusted Standard Error: | |
| Unadjusted Standard Error: | |
| Applicability | |
|---|---|
| Crash Type: | All |
| Crash Severity: | K (fatal), A (serious injury), B (minor injury), C (possible injury) |
| Roadway Types: | Not specified |
| Street Type: | Not Specified |
| Minimum Number of Lanes: | |
| Maximum Number of Lanes: | |
| Number of Lanes Direction: | |
| Number of Lanes Comment: | |
| Crash Weather: | All |
| Road Division Type: | All |
| Minimum Speed Limit: | 15 |
| Maximum Speed Limit: | 50 |
| Speed Unit: | mph |
| Speed Limit Comment: | |
| Area Type: | Urban and suburban |
| Traffic Volume: | |
| Average Traffic Volume: | |
| Time of Day: | All |
| If countermeasure is intersection-based | |
| Intersection Type: | |
| Intersection Geometry: | |
| Traffic Control: | |
| Major Road Traffic Volume: | |
| Minor Road Traffic Volume: | |
| Average Major Road Volume : | |
| Average Minor Road Volume : | |
| Development Details | |
|---|---|
| Date Range of Data Used: | 2014 to 2020 |
| Municipality: | |
| State: | CA, TX, UT |
| Country: | USA |
| Type of Methodology Used: | Regression cross-section |
| Other Details | |
|---|---|
| Included in Highway Safety Manual? | No |
| Date Added to Clearinghouse: | Jan 07, 2025 |
| Comments: | The CMF is presented in Table 7 in the paper. CMF ID 11752 is the same as CMF ID 11743 |
