CMF / CRF Details
CMF ID: 11755
Implement automated speed enforcement cameras
Description:
Prior Condition: Most similar roadways with no speed camera
Category: Advanced technology and ITS
Study: Evaluating the Effectiveness of Urban Speed Cameras on Traffic Safety in a Period of Dramatic Change, Guerra, 2024
| Star Quality Rating: |  [View score details] |
| Rating Points Total: | 90 |
| Crash Modification Factor (CMF) | |
|---|---|
| Value: | 0.58 |
| Adjusted Standard Error: | |
| Unadjusted Standard Error: | |
| Crash Reduction Factor (CRF) | |
|---|---|
| Value: | 42 (This value indicates a decrease in crashes) |
| Adjusted Standard Error: | |
| Unadjusted Standard Error: | |
| Applicability | |
|---|---|
| Crash Type: | All |
| Crash Severity: | A (serious injury), B (minor injury), C (possible injury) |
| Roadway Types: | Principal Arterial Other |
| Street Type: | Not Specified |
| Minimum Number of Lanes: | |
| Maximum Number of Lanes: | |
| Number of Lanes Direction: | |
| Number of Lanes Comment: | |
| Crash Weather: | |
| Road Division Type: | |
| Minimum Speed Limit: | |
| Maximum Speed Limit: | |
| Speed Unit: | |
| Speed Limit Comment: | |
| Area Type: | Urban |
| Traffic Volume: | |
| Average Traffic Volume: | |
| Time of Day: | |
| If countermeasure is intersection-based | |
| Intersection Type: | |
| Intersection Geometry: | |
| Traffic Control: | |
| Major Road Traffic Volume: | |
| Minor Road Traffic Volume: | |
| Average Major Road Volume : | |
| Average Minor Road Volume : | |
| Development Details | |
|---|---|
| Date Range of Data Used: | 2018 to 2022 |
| Municipality: | Philadelphia |
| State: | PA |
| Country: | USA |
| Type of Methodology Used: | |
