CMF / CRF Details
CMF ID: 2222
Commercial vs. residential land use
Description:
Prior Condition: No Prior Condition(s)
Category: Roadway
Study: Correlating Access Management to Crash Rate, Severity, and Collision Type, Schultz et al., 2008
Star Quality Rating: | [View score details] |
Rating Points Total: | 125 |
Crash Modification Factor (CMF) | |
---|---|
Value: | 1.77 |
Adjusted Standard Error: | |
Unadjusted Standard Error: | 0.308 |
Crash Reduction Factor (CRF) | |
---|---|
Value: | -77 (This value indicates an increase in crashes) |
Adjusted Standard Error: | |
Unadjusted Standard Error: | 30.77 |
Applicability | |
---|---|
Crash Type: | Angle |
Crash Severity: | All |
Roadway Types: | Principal Arterial Other |
Street Type: | |
Minimum Number of Lanes: | |
Maximum Number of Lanes: | |
Number of Lanes Direction: | |
Number of Lanes Comment: | |
Crash Weather: | Not specified |
Road Division Type: | |
Minimum Speed Limit: | |
Maximum Speed Limit: | |
Speed Unit: | |
Speed Limit Comment: | |
Area Type: | Urban |
Traffic Volume: | Minimum of 1390 to Maximum of 51200 Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT) |
Average Traffic Volume: | |
Time of Day: | All |
If countermeasure is intersection-based | |
Intersection Type: | |
Intersection Geometry: | |
Traffic Control: | |
Major Road Traffic Volume: | |
Minor Road Traffic Volume: | |
Average Major Road Volume : | |
Average Minor Road Volume : |
Development Details | |
---|---|
Date Range of Data Used: | 2002 to 2004 |
Municipality: | |
State: | UT |
Country: | |
Type of Methodology Used: | Regression cross-section |
Sample Size (site-years): | 525 site-years |
Other Details | |
---|---|
Included in Highway Safety Manual? | No |
Date Added to Clearinghouse: | Dec 01, 2009 |
Comments: |