CMF / CRF Details
Implement automated speed enforcement cameras
Countermeasure ID: 2690
Description:
Prior Condition: media coverage of automated speed enforcement
Category: Advanced technology and ITS
Study: Estimating the Longer-Term Safety Effects of Speed Enforcement Cameras in Charlotte, NC, Moon and Hummer, 2010
| Crash Modification Factor (CMF) |
|---|
| Value: | 0.85 |
| Adjusted Standard Error: | |
| Unadjusted Standard Error: | 0.11 |
| Crash Reduction Factor (CRF) |
|---|
| Value: | 15.1 (This value indicates a decrease in crashes) |
| Adjusted Standard Error: | |
| Unadjusted Standard Error: | 11.3 |
| Applicability |
|---|
| Crash Type: | All |
| Crash Severity: | K (fatal),A (serious injury),B (minor injury),C (possible injury) |
| Roadway Types: | Not Specified |
| Street Type: | |
| Minimum Number of Lanes: | |
| Maximum Number of Lanes: | |
| Number of Lanes Direction: | |
| Number of Lanes Comment: | |
| Crash Weather: | Not specified |
| Road Division Type: | |
| Minimum Speed Limit: | |
| Maximum Speed Limit: | |
| Speed Unit: | |
| Speed Limit Comment: | |
| Area Type: | |
| Traffic Volume: | |
| Average Traffic Volume: | |
| Time of Day: | All |
| If countermeasure is intersection-based |
| Intersection Type: | |
| Intersection Geometry: | |
| Traffic Control: | |
| Major Road Traffic Volume: | |
| Minor Road Traffic Volume: | |
| Average Major Road Volume : | |
| Average Minor Road Volume : | |
| Development Details |
|---|
| Date Range of Data Used: | 1994 to 2008 |
| Municipality: | Charlotte |
| State: | NC |
| Country: | |
| Type of Methodology Used: | Simple before/after |
| Sample Size (crashes): | 17063 crashes before, 2002 crashes after |
| Other Details |
|---|
| Included in Highway Safety Manual? | No |
| Date Added to Clearinghouse: | Aug 11, 2010 |
| Comments: | |
[View score details]