CMF / CRF Details
CMF ID: 2695
Removal of automated speed enforcement cameras (compared to after implementation)
Description:
Prior Condition: automated speed enforcement
Category: Advanced technology and ITS
Study: Estimating the Longer-Term Safety Effects of Speed Enforcement Cameras in Charlotte, NC, Moon and Hummer, 2010
Star Quality Rating: | [View score details] |
Rating Points Total: | 60 |
Crash Modification Factor (CMF) | |
---|---|
Value: | 0.96 |
Adjusted Standard Error: | |
Unadjusted Standard Error: | 0.05 |
Crash Reduction Factor (CRF) | |
---|---|
Value: | 3.9 (This value indicates a decrease in crashes) |
Adjusted Standard Error: | |
Unadjusted Standard Error: | 4.7 |
Applicability | |
---|---|
Crash Type: | All |
Crash Severity: | O (property damage only) |
Roadway Types: | Not Specified |
Street Type: | |
Minimum Number of Lanes: | |
Maximum Number of Lanes: | |
Number of Lanes Direction: | |
Number of Lanes Comment: | |
Crash Weather: | Not specified |
Road Division Type: | |
Minimum Speed Limit: | |
Maximum Speed Limit: | |
Speed Unit: | |
Speed Limit Comment: | |
Area Type: | |
Traffic Volume: | |
Average Traffic Volume: | |
Time of Day: | All |
If countermeasure is intersection-based | |
Intersection Type: | |
Intersection Geometry: | |
Traffic Control: | |
Major Road Traffic Volume: | |
Minor Road Traffic Volume: | |
Average Major Road Volume : | |
Average Minor Road Volume : |
Development Details | |
---|---|
Date Range of Data Used: | 1994 to 2008 |
Municipality: | Charlotte |
State: | NC |
Country: | |
Type of Methodology Used: | Simple before/after |
Sample Size (crashes): | 5593 crashes before, 6117 crashes after |
Other Details | |
---|---|
Included in Highway Safety Manual? | No |
Date Added to Clearinghouse: | Aug 11, 2010 |
Comments: |