CMF / CRF Details
CMF ID: 2919
Implement automated speed enforcement cameras
Description:
Prior Condition: No automated speed enforcement demonstration program
Category: Advanced technology and ITS
Study: Evaluation of the Scottsdale Loop 101 automated speed enforcement demonstration program, Shin et al., 2009
Star Quality Rating: | [View score details] |
Rating Points Total: | 95 |
Crash Modification Factor (CMF) | |
---|---|
Value: | 0.77 |
Adjusted Standard Error: | |
Unadjusted Standard Error: | 0.3 |
Crash Reduction Factor (CRF) | |
---|---|
Value: | 23 (This value indicates a decrease in crashes) |
Adjusted Standard Error: | |
Unadjusted Standard Error: | 30 |
Applicability | |
---|---|
Crash Type: | Rear end |
Crash Severity: | A (serious injury),B (minor injury),C (possible injury) |
Roadway Types: | Principal Arterial Other |
Street Type: | |
Minimum Number of Lanes: | |
Maximum Number of Lanes: | |
Number of Lanes Direction: | |
Number of Lanes Comment: | |
Crash Weather: | Not specified |
Road Division Type: | |
Minimum Speed Limit: | |
Maximum Speed Limit: | |
Speed Unit: | |
Speed Limit Comment: | |
Area Type: | Urban |
Traffic Volume: | |
Average Traffic Volume: | |
Time of Day: | All |
If countermeasure is intersection-based | |
Intersection Type: | |
Intersection Geometry: | |
Traffic Control: | |
Major Road Traffic Volume: | |
Minor Road Traffic Volume: | |
Average Major Road Volume : | |
Average Minor Road Volume : |
Development Details | |
---|---|
Date Range of Data Used: | 2001 to 2006 |
Municipality: | Scottsdale |
State: | AZ |
Country: | |
Type of Methodology Used: | Before/after using empirical Bayes or full Bayes |