CMF / CRF Details

CMF ID: 2941

Replacement of traditional intersection with roundabout with cycle lanes

Description: Installation of a roundabout with cycle lanes at a traditional (signalized or unsignalized) intersection. Cycle lanes in this study included: -lines + barrier (predominately) -line + no barrier (predominately) -no line + barrier -no line + no barrier

Prior Condition:  Traditional signalized or unsignalized intersection

Category: Bicyclists

Study: Injury crashes with bicyclists at roundabouts: influence of some location characteristics and the design of cycle facilities, Daniels et al., 2009

 
Star Quality Rating:2 Stars  [View score details]
Rating Points Total:40
Crash Modification Factor (CMF)
Value:1.37
Adjusted Standard Error:
Unadjusted Standard Error:0.398
Crash Reduction Factor (CRF)
Value:-37  (This value indicates an increase in crashes)
Adjusted Standard Error:
Unadjusted Standard Error:39.8
Applicability
Crash Type:Vehicle/bicycle
Crash Severity:K (fatal),A (serious injury)
Roadway Types:Not Specified
Street Type:
Minimum Number of Lanes:
Maximum Number of Lanes:
Number of Lanes Direction:
Number of Lanes Comment:
Crash Weather:Not specified
Road Division Type:All
Minimum Speed Limit:
Maximum Speed Limit:
Speed Unit:
Speed Limit Comment:
Area Type:Urban
Traffic Volume:
Average Traffic Volume:
Time of Day:All
If countermeasure is intersection-based
Intersection Type:Roadway/roadway (not interchange related)
Intersection Geometry:3-leg,4-leg
Traffic Control:Roundabout
Major Road Traffic Volume:
Minor Road Traffic Volume:
Average Major Road Volume :
Average Minor Road Volume :
Development Details
Date Range of Data Used:1991 to 2001
Municipality:
State:notusa
Country:Belgium
Type of Methodology Used:Before/after using empirical Bayes or full Bayes
Sample Size (sites):40 sites after
Other Details
Included in Highway Safety Manual?No
Date Added to Clearinghouse:Mar 21, 2011
Comments: The number of crashes in the after period were not reported in this study, however, they have been recorded as 300 to give 10 points as a beneift of doubt for one or more of the following: (1) number of miles/sites in the reference/treatment group, (2) number of crashes in the references/treatment group, (3) reporting AADTs for the aggregate dataset but not for the disaggragate dataset used for CMF development.