CMF / CRF Details
CMF ID: 4030
Adjust All-Red Clearance Interval
Description: The Fitch et al. procedure for calculating all-red clearance intervals takes into account intersection geometry and vehicle speeds. For further detail on this method, please refer to the paper.
Prior Condition: No Prior Condition(s)
Category: Intersection traffic control
Study: A Rational Method for Setting All-Red Clearance Intervals, Fitch et al., 2011
Star Quality Rating: | [View score details] |
Rating Points Total: | 20 |
Crash Modification Factor (CMF) | |
---|---|
Value: | 0.6 |
Adjusted Standard Error: | |
Unadjusted Standard Error: |
Crash Reduction Factor (CRF) | |
---|---|
Value: | 40 (This value indicates a decrease in crashes) |
Adjusted Standard Error: | |
Unadjusted Standard Error: |
Applicability | |
---|---|
Crash Type: | Angle,Head on,Sideswipe |
Crash Severity: | K (fatal),A (serious injury),B (minor injury),C (possible injury) |
Roadway Types: | Not Specified |
Street Type: | |
Minimum Number of Lanes: | |
Maximum Number of Lanes: | |
Number of Lanes Direction: | |
Number of Lanes Comment: | |
Crash Weather: | Not specified |
Road Division Type: | |
Minimum Speed Limit: | |
Maximum Speed Limit: | |
Speed Unit: | |
Speed Limit Comment: | |
Area Type: | |
Traffic Volume: | |
Average Traffic Volume: | |
Time of Day: | Not specified |
If countermeasure is intersection-based | |
Intersection Type: | |
Intersection Geometry: | |
Traffic Control: | |
Major Road Traffic Volume: | |
Minor Road Traffic Volume: | |
Average Major Road Volume : | |
Average Minor Road Volume : |
Development Details | |
---|---|
Date Range of Data Used: | |
Municipality: | Sacramento County |
State: | CA |
Country: | |
Type of Methodology Used: | Simple before/after |
Sample Size (site-years): | 118 site-years before, 118 site-years after |