CMF / CRF Details
CMF ID: 4114
Install icy curve warning system
Description: Installation of icy curve warning system (ICWS)
Prior Condition: Roadway without icy curve warning system
Category: Advanced technology and ITS
Study: Safety Effects of Icy Curve Warning Systems, Zhirui et al., 2012
Image: View the countermeasure image.
Star Quality Rating: | [View score details] |
Rating Points Total: | 85 |
Crash Modification Factor (CMF) | |
---|---|
Value: | 0.82 |
Adjusted Standard Error: | |
Unadjusted Standard Error: | 0.08 |
Crash Reduction Factor (CRF) | |
---|---|
Value: | 18 (This value indicates a decrease in crashes) |
Adjusted Standard Error: | |
Unadjusted Standard Error: | 8 |
Applicability | |
---|---|
Crash Type: | All |
Crash Severity: | All |
Roadway Types: | Not Specified |
Street Type: | |
Minimum Number of Lanes: | 2 |
Maximum Number of Lanes: | 4 |
Number of Lanes Direction: | |
Number of Lanes Comment: | |
Crash Weather: | Not specified |
Road Division Type: | All |
Minimum Speed Limit: | 40 |
Maximum Speed Limit: | 55 |
Speed Unit: | mph |
Speed Limit Comment: | |
Area Type: | Rural |
Traffic Volume: | Minimum of 2850 to Maximum of 2950 Average Daily Traffic (ADT) |
Average Traffic Volume: | 2900 Average Daily Traffic (ADT) |
Time of Day: | Not specified |
If countermeasure is intersection-based | |
Intersection Type: | |
Intersection Geometry: | |
Traffic Control: | |
Major Road Traffic Volume: | |
Minor Road Traffic Volume: | |
Average Major Road Volume : | |
Average Minor Road Volume : |
Development Details | |
---|---|
Date Range of Data Used: | 1998 to 2009 |
Municipality: | Lassen County |
State: | CA |
Country: | |
Type of Methodology Used: | Before/after using empirical Bayes or full Bayes |
Sample Size (crashes): | 56 crashes before, 18 crashes after |