CMF / CRF Details
CMF ID: 4365
Installing red light running (RLR) cameras for four-way signalized intersection
Description: Installing red light running cameras only on the approaches with high potential for crashes
Prior Condition: No red light running cameras on any of the signalized intersection approaches
Category: Advanced technology and ITS
Study: Red Light Running Camera Assessment, Sperley Ross, 2011
Star Quality Rating: | [View score details] |
Rating Points Total: | 5 |
Crash Modification Factor (CMF) | |
---|---|
Value: | 1.774 |
Adjusted Standard Error: | |
Unadjusted Standard Error: | 0.49 |
Crash Reduction Factor (CRF) | |
---|---|
Value: | -77.4 (This value indicates an increase in crashes) |
Adjusted Standard Error: | |
Unadjusted Standard Error: | 49 |
Applicability | |
---|---|
Crash Type: | Angle,Rear end,Sideswipe |
Crash Severity: | B (minor injury),O (property damage only) |
Roadway Types: | Major Collector |
Street Type: | |
Minimum Number of Lanes: | |
Maximum Number of Lanes: | |
Number of Lanes Direction: | |
Number of Lanes Comment: | |
Crash Weather: | Not specified |
Road Division Type: | Undivided |
Minimum Speed Limit: | 40 |
Maximum Speed Limit: | 40 |
Speed Unit: | mph |
Speed Limit Comment: | |
Area Type: | Urban |
Traffic Volume: | |
Average Traffic Volume: | |
Time of Day: | Not specified |
If countermeasure is intersection-based | |
Intersection Type: | Roadway/roadway (not interchange related) |
Intersection Geometry: | 4-leg |
Traffic Control: | Signalized |
Major Road Traffic Volume: | |
Minor Road Traffic Volume: | |
Average Major Road Volume : | |
Average Minor Road Volume : |
Development Details | |
---|---|
Date Range of Data Used: | 2004 to 2009 |
Municipality: | Salem |
State: | OR |
Country: | USA |
Type of Methodology Used: | Simple before/after |
Sample Size (crashes): | 31 crashes before, 23 crashes after |