CMF / CRF Details
CMF ID: 5256
Install pedestrian fencing
Description: Pedestrian fencing installed along the median of the roadway to prevent pedestrians crossing at a midblock location.
Prior Condition: Without pedestrian fencing
Category: Pedestrians
Study: Safety countermeasures and crash reduction in New York City - Experience and lessons learned, Chen et al., 2013
Star Quality Rating: | [View score details] |
Rating Points Total: | 70 |
Crash Modification Factor (CMF) | |
---|---|
Value: | 1.18 |
Adjusted Standard Error: | |
Unadjusted Standard Error: | 0.65 |
Crash Reduction Factor (CRF) | |
---|---|
Value: | -18 (This value indicates an increase in crashes) |
Adjusted Standard Error: | |
Unadjusted Standard Error: | 65 |
Applicability | |
---|---|
Crash Type: | Vehicle/pedestrian |
Crash Severity: | All |
Roadway Types: | Not specified |
Street Type: | |
Minimum Number of Lanes: | |
Maximum Number of Lanes: | |
Number of Lanes Direction: | |
Number of Lanes Comment: | |
Crash Weather: | Not specified |
Road Division Type: | |
Minimum Speed Limit: | |
Maximum Speed Limit: | |
Speed Unit: | |
Speed Limit Comment: | |
Area Type: | Urban |
Traffic Volume: | |
Average Traffic Volume: | |
Time of Day: | |
If countermeasure is intersection-based | |
Intersection Type: | |
Intersection Geometry: | |
Traffic Control: | |
Major Road Traffic Volume: | |
Minor Road Traffic Volume: | |
Average Major Road Volume : | |
Average Minor Road Volume : |
Development Details | |
---|---|
Date Range of Data Used: | 1989 to 2008 |
Municipality: | New York City |
State: | NY |
Country: | |
Type of Methodology Used: | Other before/after |