CMF / CRF Details
CMF ID: 6878
Install red-light cameras
Description: RLR enforcement cameras
Prior Condition: Signalized intersections without Red-light camera
Category: Advanced technology and ITS
Study: Safety Evaluation of Red Light Camera and Intersection Speed Camera Programs in Alberta, Izadpanah et al., 2015
Star Quality Rating: | [View score details] |
Rating Points Total: | 140 |
Crash Modification Factor (CMF) | |
---|---|
Value: | 0.623 |
Adjusted Standard Error: | |
Unadjusted Standard Error: | 0.02 |
Crash Reduction Factor (CRF) | |
---|---|
Value: | 37.7 (This value indicates a decrease in crashes) |
Adjusted Standard Error: | |
Unadjusted Standard Error: | 2 |
Applicability | |
---|---|
Crash Type: | Angle |
Crash Severity: | All |
Roadway Types: | Not specified |
Street Type: | |
Minimum Number of Lanes: | |
Maximum Number of Lanes: | |
Number of Lanes Direction: | |
Number of Lanes Comment: | |
Crash Weather: | Not specified |
Road Division Type: | |
Minimum Speed Limit: | |
Maximum Speed Limit: | |
Speed Unit: | |
Speed Limit Comment: | |
Area Type: | Urban and suburban |
Traffic Volume: | |
Average Traffic Volume: | |
Time of Day: | All |
If countermeasure is intersection-based | |
Intersection Type: | Roadway/roadway (not interchange related) |
Intersection Geometry: | 3-leg,4-leg |
Traffic Control: | Signalized |
Major Road Traffic Volume: | |
Minor Road Traffic Volume: | |
Average Major Road Volume : | |
Average Minor Road Volume : |
Development Details | |
---|---|
Date Range of Data Used: | 1995 to 2008 |
Municipality: | Alberta |
State: | notusa |
Country: | Canada |
Type of Methodology Used: | Before/after using empirical Bayes or full Bayes |
Sample Size (crashes): | 1129 crashes after |
Sample Size (sites): | 80 sites before, 80 sites after |
Other Details | |
---|---|
Included in Highway Safety Manual? | No |
Date Added to Clearinghouse: | Nov 01, 2015 |
Comments: | CMF for angle crashes |