CMF / CRF Details
CMF ID: 7585
Implement mobile automated speed enforcement system
Description:
Mobile unit vans with noticeable markings were parked close to the roadway. Police officers in vans operated laser guns and software. Signage and media campaigns informed drivers of enforcement.
Prior Condition: No photo radar
Category: Advanced technology and ITS
Crash Modification Factor (CMF) |
---|
Value: | 0.821 |
Adjusted Standard Error: | |
Unadjusted Standard Error: | 0.054 |
Crash Reduction Factor (CRF) |
---|
Value: | 17.9 (This value indicates a decrease in crashes) |
Adjusted Standard Error: | |
Unadjusted Standard Error: | 5.4 |
Applicability |
---|
Crash Type: | Speed related |
Crash Severity: | O (property damage only) |
Roadway Types: | Principal Arterial Other |
Street Type: | |
Minimum Number of Lanes: | |
Maximum Number of Lanes: | |
Number of Lanes Direction: | |
Number of Lanes Comment: | |
Crash Weather: | Not specified |
Road Division Type: | All |
Minimum Speed Limit: | |
Maximum Speed Limit: | |
Speed Unit: | |
Speed Limit Comment: | |
Area Type: | Urban |
Traffic Volume: | Minimum of 2079 to Maximum of 22960 Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT) |
Average Traffic Volume: | 9781 Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT) |
Time of Day: | All |
If countermeasure is intersection-based |
Intersection Type: | |
Intersection Geometry: | |
Traffic Control: | |
Major Road Traffic Volume: | |
Minor Road Traffic Volume: | |
Average Major Road Volume : | |
Average Minor Road Volume : | |
Development Details |
---|
Date Range of Data Used: | 2005 to 2012 |
Municipality: | City of Edmonton |
State: | notusa |
Country: | Canada |
Type of Methodology Used: | Before/after using empirical Bayes or full Bayes |
Sample Size (sites): | 93 sites before, 93 sites after |
Other Details |
---|
Included in Highway Safety Manual? | No |
Date Added to Clearinghouse: | Nov 01, 2015 |
Comments: | The number of crashes in the after period were not reported in this study, however, they have been recorded as 300 to give 10 points as a beneift of doubt for one or more of the following: (1) number of miles/sites in the reference/treatment group, (2) number of crashes in the references/treatment group, (3) reporting AADTs for the aggregate dataset but not for the disaggragate dataset used for CMF development. |