CMF / CRF Details
CMF ID: 8090
Install red-light cameras
Description: RLR enforcement cameras
Prior Condition: Intersection without RLC
Category: Advanced technology and ITS
Study: Estimating safety performance trends over time for treatments at intersections in Florida, Wang et al., 2015
Star Quality Rating: | [View score details] |
Rating Points Total: | 115 |
Crash Modification Factor (CMF) | |
---|---|
Value: | 0.652 |
Adjusted Standard Error: | |
Unadjusted Standard Error: | 0.057 |
Crash Reduction Factor (CRF) | |
---|---|
Value: | 34.8 (This value indicates a decrease in crashes) |
Adjusted Standard Error: | |
Unadjusted Standard Error: | 5.7 |
Applicability | |
---|---|
Crash Type: | All |
Crash Severity: | K (fatal),A (serious injury),B (minor injury),C (possible injury) |
Roadway Types: | Not specified |
Street Type: | |
Minimum Number of Lanes: | |
Maximum Number of Lanes: | |
Number of Lanes Direction: | |
Number of Lanes Comment: | |
Crash Weather: | Not specified |
Road Division Type: | |
Minimum Speed Limit: | |
Maximum Speed Limit: | |
Speed Unit: | |
Speed Limit Comment: | |
Area Type: | |
Traffic Volume: | |
Average Traffic Volume: | |
Time of Day: | |
If countermeasure is intersection-based | |
Intersection Type: | Roadway/roadway (not interchange related) |
Intersection Geometry: | Not specified |
Traffic Control: | Signalized |
Major Road Traffic Volume: | |
Minor Road Traffic Volume: | |
Average Major Road Volume : | |
Average Minor Road Volume : |
Development Details | |
---|---|
Date Range of Data Used: | 2003 to 2013 |
Municipality: | |
State: | FL |
Country: | |
Type of Methodology Used: | Before/after using comparison group |
Sample Size (sites): | 19 sites before, 19 sites after |
Other Details | |
---|---|
Included in Highway Safety Manual? | No |
Date Added to Clearinghouse: | Nov 10, 2016 |
Comments: | F&I crashes months 1-36 after RLC installation |