CMF / CRF Details
CMF ID: 9024
Install rectangular rapid flashing beacon (RRFB)
Description: Install rectangular rapid flashing beacon (RRFB)
Prior Condition: No RRFB
Category: Pedestrians
Study: Development of Crash Modification Factors for Uncontrolled Pedestrian Crossing Treatments, Zegeer et al., 2017
Star Quality Rating: | [View score details] |
Rating Points Total: | 85 |
Crash Modification Factor (CMF) | |
---|---|
Value: | 0.526 |
Adjusted Standard Error: | |
Unadjusted Standard Error: | 0.377 |
Crash Reduction Factor (CRF) | |
---|---|
Value: | 47.4 (This value indicates a decrease in crashes) |
Adjusted Standard Error: | |
Unadjusted Standard Error: | 37.7 |
Applicability | |
---|---|
Crash Type: | Vehicle/pedestrian |
Crash Severity: | All |
Roadway Types: | Minor Arterial |
Street Type: | |
Minimum Number of Lanes: | 2 |
Maximum Number of Lanes: | 8 |
Number of Lanes Direction: | |
Number of Lanes Comment: | |
Crash Weather: | Not specified |
Road Division Type: | |
Minimum Speed Limit: | |
Maximum Speed Limit: | |
Speed Unit: | |
Speed Limit Comment: | |
Area Type: | Urban and suburban |
Traffic Volume: | Minimum of 533 to Maximum of 49402 Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT) |
Average Traffic Volume: | 15958 Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT) |
Time of Day: | All |
If countermeasure is intersection-based | |
Intersection Type: | |
Intersection Geometry: | |
Traffic Control: | |
Major Road Traffic Volume: | |
Minor Road Traffic Volume: | |
Average Major Road Volume : | |
Average Minor Road Volume : |
Development Details | |
---|---|
Date Range of Data Used: | 2004 to 2013 |
Municipality: | |
State: | AZ,FL,IL,MA,NY,NC,OR,VA,WI |
Country: | USA |
Type of Methodology Used: | Regression cross-section |
Sample Size (site-years): | 1928 site-years |
Other Details | |
---|---|
Included in Highway Safety Manual? | No |
Date Added to Clearinghouse: | Nov 17, 2017 |
Comments: |