CMF / CRF Details
CMF ID: 9191
Deactivate red-light camera
Description:
Prior Condition: Nearby intersection has red-light cameras
Category: Advanced technology and ITS
Study: Effects of Red Light Running Camera Systems Installation and Then Deactivation on Intersection Safety, Ko et al., 2017
Star Quality Rating: | [View score details] |
Rating Points Total: | 85 |
Crash Modification Factor (CMF) | |
---|---|
Value: | 1.2 |
Adjusted Standard Error: | |
Unadjusted Standard Error: | 0.16 |
Crash Reduction Factor (CRF) | |
---|---|
Value: | -20 (This value indicates an increase in crashes) |
Adjusted Standard Error: | |
Unadjusted Standard Error: | 16 |
Applicability | |
---|---|
Crash Type: | Other |
Crash Severity: | K (fatal),A (serious injury),B (minor injury),C (possible injury) |
Roadway Types: | Not specified |
Street Type: | |
Minimum Number of Lanes: | |
Maximum Number of Lanes: | |
Number of Lanes Direction: | |
Number of Lanes Comment: | |
Crash Weather: | Not specified |
Road Division Type: | All |
Minimum Speed Limit: | |
Maximum Speed Limit: | |
Speed Unit: | |
Speed Limit Comment: | |
Area Type: | Urban |
Traffic Volume: | |
Average Traffic Volume: | |
Time of Day: | All |
If countermeasure is intersection-based | |
Intersection Type: | |
Intersection Geometry: | No values chosen. |
Traffic Control: | Signalized |
Major Road Traffic Volume: | |
Minor Road Traffic Volume: | |
Average Major Road Volume : | |
Average Minor Road Volume : |
Development Details | |
---|---|
Date Range of Data Used: | 2008 to 2014 |
Municipality: | Houston |
State: | TX |
Country: | USA |
Type of Methodology Used: | Before/after using empirical Bayes or full Bayes |
Sample Size (crashes): | 86 crashes before, 94 crashes after |
Sample Size (sites): | 27 sites before, 27 sites after |
Other Details | |
---|---|
Included in Highway Safety Manual? | No |
Date Added to Clearinghouse: | Jun 17, 2018 |
Comments: | CMF of red-light running crashes at nearby non-treated intersections after RLC system deactivation. |