CMF / CRF Details
CMF ID: 9913
Modify signal phasing (implement a leading pedestrian interval)
Description:
Prior Condition: Signal phasing without leading pedestrian interval
Category: Intersection traffic control
Study: Safety Evaluation of Protected Left-Turn Phasing and Leading Pedestrian Intervals on Pedestrian Safety, Goughnour et al., 2018
Star Quality Rating: | [View score details] |
Rating Points Total: | 120 |
Crash Modification Factor (CMF) | |
---|---|
Value: | 0.9 |
Adjusted Standard Error: | |
Unadjusted Standard Error: | 0.09 |
Crash Reduction Factor (CRF) | |
---|---|
Value: | 10 (This value indicates a decrease in crashes) |
Adjusted Standard Error: | |
Unadjusted Standard Error: | 9 |
Applicability | |
---|---|
Crash Type: | All |
Crash Severity: | All |
Roadway Types: | All |
Street Type: | |
Minimum Number of Lanes: | |
Maximum Number of Lanes: | |
Number of Lanes Direction: | |
Number of Lanes Comment: | |
Crash Weather: | Not specified |
Road Division Type: | |
Minimum Speed Limit: | |
Maximum Speed Limit: | |
Speed Unit: | |
Speed Limit Comment: | |
Area Type: | Urban and suburban |
Traffic Volume: | |
Average Traffic Volume: | |
Time of Day: | All |
If countermeasure is intersection-based | |
Intersection Type: | Roadway/roadway (not interchange related) |
Intersection Geometry: | Not specified |
Traffic Control: | Signalized |
Major Road Traffic Volume: | Minimum of 17781 to Maximum of 49687 Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT) |
Minor Road Traffic Volume: | |
Average Major Road Volume : | 38359 Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT) |
Average Minor Road Volume : |
Development Details | |
---|---|
Date Range of Data Used: | 2009 to 2015 |
Municipality: | Charlotte |
State: | NC |
Country: | |
Type of Methodology Used: | Before/after using empirical Bayes or full Bayes |
Sample Size (crashes): | 176 crashes before, 257 crashes after |
Sample Size (sites): | 7 sites before, 7 sites after |