Study Details
Study Title: The Group Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator "GLASSO" Technique: Application in Variable Selection and Crash Prediction at Unsignalized Intersections
Authors: Haleem and Abdel-Aty
Publication Date:JUN, 2010
Abstract: In this paper, we propose a new promising machine learning technique to select important explanatory covariates, as well as to improve crash prediction; the group least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (GLASSO) technique. GLASSO"s main strength lies in its ability to deal with datasets having relatively large number of categorical variables, which is the case in this study. Identifying the significant factors affecting safety of unsignalized intersections was also an essential objective. Two applications of GLASSO were investigated; application for variable screening before fitting the traditional negative binomial (NB) model, as well as before fitting another promising data mining technique (the multivariate adaptive regression splines "MARS"). Extensive data collected at 2475 unsignalized intersections were used. For fitting the NB models, the backward deletion and the random forest techniques were separately used as variables 11 screening, and their prediction performance was compared to that from GLASSO. All the three methods resulted in almost similar predictions. For GLASSO's second application with MARS, the model fitting relatively outperformed that from the random forest technique with MARS, with similar prediction performance. Due to its outstanding performance with categorical variables, as well as its simplicity, GLASSO is recommended as a promising variable selection technique. Significant predictors affecting total crashes at unsignalized intersections were traffic volume on the major road, the upstream and downstream distances to the nearest signalized intersection, median type on major and minor approaches, and type of land use. Resembling previous studies, the volume of traffic was the most important predictor.
Study Citation: Haleem, K. and Abdel-Aty, M. "The Group Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator "GLASSO" Technique: Application in Variable Selection and Crash Prediction at Unsignalized Intersections." Presented at the 90th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., (2011).
CMFs Associated With This Study
Category: Access management
Countermeasure: Add markings to the major approach of unsignalized 3-leg intersection to serve as a median
CMF | CRF(%) | Quality | Crash Type | Crash Severity | Roadway Type | Area Type |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.7 | 30 | All | All | Not Specified | All |
Countermeasure: Add Two-Way-Left-Turn-Lane (TWLTL) to the major approach of an unsignalized 3-leg intersection
CMF | CRF(%) | Quality | Crash Type | Crash Severity | Roadway Type | Area Type |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.69 | 31 | All | All | Not Specified | All |
Countermeasure: Add Two-Way-Left-Turn-Lane (TWLTL) to the major approach of an unsignalized 4-leg intersection
CMF | CRF(%) | Quality | Crash Type | Crash Severity | Roadway Type | Area Type |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.66 | 34 | All | All | Not Specified | All |
Countermeasure: Convert a 3-leg unsignalized intersection at a driveway to a regular 3-leg unsignalized intersection
CMF | CRF(%) | Quality | Crash Type | Crash Severity | Roadway Type | Area Type |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.41 | -41 | All | All | Not Specified | All |
Countermeasure: Convert an open median on the major approach to unsignalized 3-leg intersection to a closed median
CMF | CRF(%) | Quality | Crash Type | Crash Severity | Roadway Type | Area Type |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.02 | -2 | All | All | Not Specified | All |
Countermeasure: Convert an open median to a mixed median on the major approach to a 3-leg unsignalized intersection
CMF | CRF(%) | Quality | Crash Type | Crash Severity | Roadway Type | Area Type |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.95 | 5 | All | All | Not Specified | All |
Countermeasure: Convert an open median to an undivided median on the major approach to an unsignalized 3-leg intersection
CMF | CRF(%) | Quality | Crash Type | Crash Severity | Roadway Type | Area Type |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.85 | 15 | All | All | Not Specified | All |
Countermeasure: Convert the open median on the major approach of an unsignalized 3-leg intersection to a directional median
CMF | CRF(%) | Quality | Crash Type | Crash Severity | Roadway Type | Area Type |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.86 | 14 | All | All | Not Specified | All |
Countermeasure: Install median on the minor approach of an unsignalized 3-leg intersection
CMF | CRF(%) | Quality | Crash Type | Crash Severity | Roadway Type | Area Type |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.82 | 18 | All | All | Not Specified | All |
Category:Intersection geometry
Countermeasure: Convert a 3-leg unsignalized intersection at a driveway to a 3-leg unsignalized intersection at a ramp junction
CMF | CRF(%) | Quality | Crash Type | Crash Severity | Roadway Type | Area Type |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.29 | -129 | All | All | Not Specified | All |
Countermeasure: Convert a 4-leg unsignalized intersection at driveways to a regular 4-leg unsignalized intersection
CMF | CRF(%) | Quality | Crash Type | Crash Severity | Roadway Type | Area Type |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.11 | -11 | All | All | Not Specified | All |
Countermeasure: Install one left-turn lane on both major road directions
CMF | CRF(%) | Quality | Crash Type | Crash Severity | Roadway Type | Area Type |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.36 | -36 | All | All | Not Specified | All |
Countermeasure: Install one left-turn lane on the minor approach of an unsignalized 3-leg intersection
CMF | CRF(%) | Quality | Crash Type | Crash Severity | Roadway Type | Area Type |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.75 | 25 | All | All | Not Specified | All |
Countermeasure: Installation of left-turn lanes on both major road approaches
CMF | CRF(%) | Quality | Crash Type | Crash Severity | Roadway Type | Area Type |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.73 | 27 | All | All | Not Specified | All |
Countermeasure: Provide a right-turn lane on one major-road approach
CMF | CRF(%) | Quality | Crash Type | Crash Severity | Roadway Type | Area Type |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.83 | 17 | All | All | Not Specified | All |
Category:Intersection traffic control
Countermeasure: Install a stop sign on both minor approaches of an unsignalized intersection
CMF | CRF(%) | Quality | Crash Type | Crash Severity | Roadway Type | Area Type |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.78 | 22 | All | All | Not Specified | All |
Category:Pedestrians
Countermeasure: Install crosswalk on one minor approach
CMF | CRF(%) | Quality | Crash Type | Crash Severity | Roadway Type | Area Type |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.35 | 65 | All | All | Not Specified | All |
Category:Shoulder treatments
Countermeasure: Change right shoulder width from X to Y
CMF | CRF(%) | Quality | Crash Type | Crash Severity | Roadway Type | Area Type |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
All | All | Not Specified | All |