Study Details
Study Title: Safety Effects of Fixed Automated Spray Technology Systems
Authors: Veneziano et al.
Publication Date:JAN, 2015
Abstract: Fixed Automated Spray Technology (FAST) has emerged as a solution to provide quick, effective service delivery to such high-risk locations prone to icy conditions and/or with high traffic volumes. The Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) has installed and used FAST on bridges since 1998, with 32 units currently installed on bridges around the state. There is some concern regarding how effective they are in reducing accidents during winter weather. Previous FAST studies have considered the changes to crash occurrence following deployment, but these have been basic and compared seasonal figures or rates without accounting for site conditions. To address this shortcoming, an observational before-after study with the Empirical Bayes technique was used to determine the effect of FAST systems on crash frequencies. Results revealed that at sites where crashes were reduced, FAST systems contributed to an annual reduction of 2 percent on multilane rural highways, 16 to 70 percent on urban interstates, 31 to 57 percent on rural interstates and 19 to 40 percent on interchange ramps between interstates. However, at some sites, safety deteriorated with an increase in crashes. While the precise causes of such increases are not completely clear, they may have been the result of increased traffic, systems not being maintained properly, or systems applying fluids in improper amounts or at the wrong time. Based on the collective results, high traffic, high crash severity locations are most suitable for FAST deployments.
Study Citation: Veneziano, D., A. Muthumani, and X. Shi. "Safety Effects of Fixed Automated Spray Technology Systems". Presented at the 94th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Paper No. 15-0756, Washington, D.C., (2015).
Comments: Some CMFs were not included given that they were based on zero crashes in before and after periods.
CMFs Associated With This Study
Category: Advanced technology and ITS
Countermeasure: Install Fixed Automated Spray Technology (FAST)
CMF | CRF(%) | Quality | Crash Type | Crash Severity | Roadway Type | Area Type |
---|
1.57 | -57 | | All | All | Not specified | Rural |
0.98 | 2 | | All | All | Not specified | Rural |
0.84 | 16 | | All | All | Principal Arterial Interstate | Urban |
0.3 | 70 | | All | All | Principal Arterial Interstate | Urban |
0.44 | 56 | | All | All | Principal Arterial Interstate | Urban |
0 | 100 | | All | All | Principal Arterial Interstate | Urban |
0.46 | 54 | | All | All | Principal Arterial Interstate | Urban |
0.42 | 58 | | All | All | Principal Arterial Interstate | Urban |
0.77 | 23 | | All | All | Principal Arterial Interstate | Urban |
0.43 | 57 | | All | All | Principal Arterial Interstate | Rural |
0.69 | 31 | | All | All | Principal Arterial Interstate | Rural |
1.17 | -17 | | All | All | Principal Arterial Interstate | Rural |
2.34 | -134 | | All | All | Principal Arterial Interstate | Rural |
2.48 | -148 | | All | All | Principal Arterial Interstate | Rural |
2.65 | -165 | | All | All | Principal Arterial Interstate | Rural |