Study Details
Study Title: Identifying the Safety Impact of Signal Coordination Projects along Urban Arterials Using a Meta-analysis Method
Authors: Williamson et al.
Publication Date: 2018
Abstract: The safety impact of changes to roadway operations have been of interests in recent years with the publication of the
Highway Safety Manual. One area that is in need of further study is the safety impact of traffic signal coordination projects in urban
areas. Specifically, this study seeks to identify the safety benefit from traffic signal coordination projects on major arterial roadways
through urban areas using a before and after study with a comparison groups approach and a meta-analysis method. The findings
suggest that traffic signal coordination could decrease total crashes by 21 percent, injury crashes by 52 percent and
property-damage-only crashes by 21 percent. The results can be utilized by engineering practitioners to estimate the safety benefits for
projects that seek to coordinate traffic signals along an urban corridor. Because these projects can both improve the safety of roadways
while improving traffic flow, the application of these findings could be broad.
Study Citation: Williamson, M. R., R. N. Fries, Y. Qi, and P. Mandava. "Identifying the Safety Impact of Signal Coordination
Projects along Urban Arterials Using a Meta-analysis
Method". Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, No. 6, (2018) pp. 61-72.
Study Report: Download the Study Report Document
CMFs Associated With This Study
Category: Intersection traffic control
Countermeasure: Coordinate arterial signals
CMF | CRF(%) | Quality | Crash Type | Crash Severity | Roadway Type | Area Type |
---|
1.15 | -15 | | All | All | Not specified | Suburban |
0.42 | 58 | | All | A,B,C | Not specified | Suburban |
0.95 | 5 | | All | All | Not specified | Urban |
0.42 | 58 | | All | A,B,C | Not specified | Urban |
0.38 | 62 | | All | All | Not specified | Suburban |
0.33 | | | All | A,B,C | Not specified | Suburban |
0.41 | 59 | | All | O | Not specified | Suburban |
1.01 | -1 | | All | All | Not specified | Suburban |
1.25 | -25 | | All | A,B,C | Not specified | Suburban |
0.86 | 14 | | All | O | Not specified | Suburban |
1.1 | -10 | | All | All | Not specified | Suburban |
0.8 | 20 | | All | O | Not specified | Suburban |
0.79 | 21 | | All | All | Not specified | Urban and suburban |
0.48 | 52 | | All | A,B,C | Not specified | Urban and suburban |
0.79 | 21 | | All | O | Not specified | Urban and suburban |