CMF / CRF Details
CMF ID: 1974
Changeable Curve Speed Warning signs
Description:
Prior Condition: prior
Category: Advanced technology and ITS
Study: An Evaluation of Dynamic Curve Warning Systems in the Sacramento River Canyon, Tribbet, L., McGowen, P., and Mounce, J., 2000
Star Quality Rating: | [View score details] |
Rating Points Total: | 0 |
Crash Modification Factor (CMF) | |
---|---|
Value: | 2 |
Adjusted Standard Error: | 4 |
Unadjusted Standard Error: | 3 |
Crash Reduction Factor (CRF) | |
---|---|
Value: | 0 (This value indicates a decrease in crashes) |
Adjusted Standard Error: | 31 |
Unadjusted Standard Error: | 2 |
Applicability | |
---|---|
Crash Type: | Single vehicle,Speed related |
Crash Severity: | |
Roadway Types: | Principal Arterial Other Freeways and Expressways |
Street Type: | |
Minimum Number of Lanes: | 5 |
Maximum Number of Lanes: | 5 |
Number of Lanes Direction: | |
Number of Lanes Comment: | |
Crash Weather: | Not specified |
Road Division Type: | Undivided |
Minimum Speed Limit: | 55 |
Maximum Speed Limit: | 55 |
Speed Unit: | mph |
Speed Limit Comment: | |
Area Type: | All |
Traffic Volume: | |
Average Traffic Volume: | |
Time of Day: | All |
If countermeasure is intersection-based | |
Intersection Type: | Roadway/bicycle path or trail |
Intersection Geometry: | 4-leg |
Traffic Control: | Signalized |
Major Road Traffic Volume: | Minimum of 2 to Maximum of 3 |
Minor Road Traffic Volume: | Minimum of 4 to Maximum of 3 |
Average Major Road Volume : | |
Average Minor Road Volume : |
Development Details | |
---|---|
Date Range of Data Used: | 1953 to 1977 |
Municipality: | |
State: | AK,AZ,AR,CA,CO,CT |
Country: | |
Type of Methodology Used: | Case-control |
Sample Size (miles): | 3 miles |
Other Details | |
---|---|
Included in Highway Safety Manual? | No |
Date Added to Clearinghouse: | Dec 01, 2009 |
Comments: |